Beyond Borders: World Wildlife Fund’s Transboundary Wildlife Conservation Projects in the Northern Great PlainsVolume 16, No. 4, 2010 • Montana Chapter of the Wildlife Society (TWS) - Presentation Abstract
[pdfjs-viewer url=”http://www.intermountainjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/IJS-2010-v16-n4-Abstract-Bly-pp116.pdf” viewer_width=644px viewer_height=700px fullscreen=false download=false print=true openfile=false]
Scroll down if pdf (above) appears blank.
Conservation, wildlife, Black-footed ferret restoration, Long-billed curlew migration, Couger research, Prairie pothole joint venture, wwf, world wildlife fund, The World Wildlife Fund, northern, transboundary, northern great plains, world wildlife funds, World Wildlife Fund's Transboundary Wildlife Conservation Projects, World Wildlife Fund's Northern Great Plains Program, Northern mixed grass transboundary conservation initiative, Crossing the Medicine Line Network
Biological Sciences - Terrestrial
The World Wildlife Fund’s (WWF) Northern Great Plains Program (NGP) spans five states and two provinces across 279,000 mi2 of mixed-grass prairie. Since its inception as an ecoregional program in 2003, the WWF NGP has been engaged in numerous multijurisdictional and cross-border initiatives designed to foster communication and coordinate actions to achieve biodiversity conservation in the shared landscapes. From black-footed ferret restoration, long-billed curlew migration, and cougar research to climate change adaptation and conservation economics, we collaborate, financially contribute to, and lead over 50 projects with as many domestic and international partners. One set of partnerships is centered in northern Montana, southwest Saskatchewan, and southeast Alberta focused on conserving crucial habitats and connectivity for pronghorn. This project area is also home to other partnerships WWF participates in, such as the Prairie Pothole Joint Venture, Northern Mixed Grass Transboundary Conservation Initiative, and its successor, Crossing the Medicine Line Network. While these initiatives share the common objective of fostering biodiversity conservation across boundaries, there are differences between them involving varied historical and cultural backgrounds, legal, and regulatory regimes. Nature does not recognize county, state, tribal, governmental, or international borders, thus transboundary collaboration is essential to successfully achieving common conservation objectives.