The Suitability Of Large Culverts As Crossing Structures For Deer

Volume 17, No. 1-4, Montana Chapter of the Wildlife Society (TWS) - Poster Abstract

[pdfjs-viewer url=”” viewer_width=644px viewer_height=700px fullscreen=false download=false print=true openfile=false]

Scroll down if pdf (above) appears blank.

Download as PDF View on MSU Scholarworks View as HTML


, , , ,


culvert, Montana State University, Montana, wildlife, deer, Flathead Indian Reservation, Western Transportation Institute, crossing

Scientific Disciplines

Biological Sciences - Terrestrial

Abstract Text

Most researchers that have investigated the use of wildlife crossing structures have done so through counting the number of animals present in the structures or the number of animals that crossed the road using the structures. However, we argue that crossing structure acceptance, as a percentage of all approaches, is a better measure of suitability. Once the acceptance of certain types and dimensions of crossing structures is known for different wildlife species, agencies can select crossing structures that meet certain goals. We used this method for one particular type of crossing structure; large diameter culverts. We placed wildlife cameras (Reconyx™) at the entrance of nine corrugated metal arched culverts located along US Highway 93 on the Flathead Indian Reservation, Montana; to capture approach behavior. We specifically examined the number of successful and aborted crossing attempts. White-tailed and mule deer were the most frequently observed species and had an acceptance rate of 84 percent (n = 455) and 66 percent (n = 56) respectively. Only 49 percent (n = 426) of
the groups that passed the structures successfully showed an alert posture versus 93 percent (n = 98) for the groups that aborted the attempts. The two deer species showed slightly different levels of alertness with an alert posture for 55 percent of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) events and 68 percent for mule deer (O. hemionus)events for all crossing attempts combined. The data show that wildlife acceptance rates and behavior at structures can vary between species and data on varying structure type and dimensions will add to our understanding of structure acceptability for various target species.